Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, getting an 87.1 score against 85.3. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is way newer and lighter, but a lot thicker than Microsoft Surface Duo 2.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch, a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with way more screen brightness. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra have very similar battery durations, although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.