Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Smoke black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Moto G Power has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and thinner than the Moto G Power.
Motorola Moto G Power features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and better 60 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Power counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.