Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Moto G8 Power, getting a global score of 87.1 against 76. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a thinner phone than Moto G8 Power, but both weight 6.95oz.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G8 Power features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a little longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better camera than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.