Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having an 87.1 score against 75.8. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen. Moto Z Force features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a lot better 50 MP resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with improved battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.