Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a general score of 87.1 against 76.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is way newer than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a much worse screen pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has improved battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures, better video frame rates and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.