Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a global score of 87.1 against 77.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is noticeably newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a way lower pixels number per inch of display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a lot bigger sensor, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.