Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Moto Z2 Play, having an 87.1 score against 77.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer cellphone than Moto Z2 Play, but it is incredibly thicker and incredibly heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.