Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Moto Z3's general score of 77.6. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than the Moto Z3, it's noticeably heavier and a lot thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto Z3 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations, a back camera with a much better resolution, a lot larger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.