Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is incredibly newer, but incredibly heavier and noticeably thicker than Moto Z3 Play. Moto Z3 Play counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger sensor, a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.