Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Motorola One 5G, having an 87.1 score against 84.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is incredibly newer, a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Motorola One 5G. Motorola One 5G has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Motorola One 5G, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch in the screen, they both have a display of the same size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 fps video frame rate, a more MP camera in the back, a bigger aperture and a much bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.