Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Motorola One Action. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Action, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola One Action features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture, a camera in the back with a way better 50 MP resolution and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has greater battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.