Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer phone, and it's also just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola One Hyper.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Hyper features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a way worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.