Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer phone, and it's also lighter and a little bit thinner than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW. These devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10 version, providing some additional features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a just a little better pixels number per inch in the screen. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor capturing way worse quality pictures and videos and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a battery life that is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.