Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer device than the Nokia 9 PureView, although it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot worse pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has more internal storage. The Nokia 9 PureView features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features longer battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments, a much bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.