Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer device, and it is also just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 12 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little higher screen pixels density.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rate, a back-facing camera with more megapixels, a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.