Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a extremely newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, providing a couple additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, way more brightness and a just a bit better pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and the nubia Red Magic 5S have quite similar cameras, because although the nubia Red Magic 5S has a much smaller back camera sensor shooting much lower quality videos and pictures and a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and the nubia Red Magic 5S count with very similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.