Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Ocean |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than OPPO Find X2, with a score of 87.1 against 79.7. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than the OPPO Find X2, it is a little bit heavier and a little thicker. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit inferior pixels count in each inch in the display, and they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a lot brighter screen.
OPPO Find X2 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of them have 12 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a better resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.