Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Ocean |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer device, and it is also just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better screen than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, and they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with way more brightness.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both have 12 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X2 Pro's memory for apps and games is very similar to Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's one, they have exactly the same internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures just a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with a better 50 mega pixels resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.