Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, with a score of 87.1 against 77. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is much newer, but a bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A20s.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A20s, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a higher screen pixels density and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A20s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A20s counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a 13% more battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A20s, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.