Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy A21, getting an 87.1 score against 76.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features and improved performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A21, but it is just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier.
The Galaxy A21 has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, more pixels per inch of screen and a bit bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A21, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor, a back camera with a way higher resolution, a larger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A21, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A21, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.