Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the Galaxy A21s's 77.7 global score. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little heavier than Galaxy A21s, it's a little thinner and a lot newer. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version, giving a couple additional features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better screen than Galaxy A21s, because it has more pixels per display inch, a little bit bigger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A21s features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because it has a bigger aperture to take better images in low light situations, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a better resolution back camera and a lot bigger sensor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A21s counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.