Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A22's score of 76.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A22, but it is just a little bit heavier and a little thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit larger display and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A22, because it has a lot better video quality, a better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.