Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Galaxy A30s, having a global score of 87.1 against 79.8. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much newer than the Galaxy A30s, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, providing some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy A30s features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a higher pixel density and a quite bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 13% more battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A30s, because it has a bigger aperture for better captures in low-light situations, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.