Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Galaxy A31, having a score of 87.1 against 81.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A31, but it's just a little heavier. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite worse screen density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a quite larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A31 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A31, because it has a more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger aperture for better low light images and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.