Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A34's global score of 82.9. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Galaxy A34 has Android 13, so it gives a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A34, because it has a more mega pixels back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video and a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Galaxy A34 has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.