Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A40's general score of 79.6. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A40 has Android 11, giving some nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is extremely newer than the Galaxy A40's, but it is noticeably heavier and a bit thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking display than Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit worse pixel amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A40 has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A40, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 50 MP resolution, a lot higher (4K) video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a bigger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 45 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.