Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A41's 81.7 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy A41, although it's heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version, providing the user some extra features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A41 features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a more mega pixels camera, faster video frame rate and a much larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A41, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.