Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Galaxy A42, having a general score of 87.1 against 87. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy A42, but it is a little bit heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Galaxy A42 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A42 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better display than Galaxy A42, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A42, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A42 features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture for better photos in low-light situations, a higher resolution camera in the back and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.