Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a general score of 87.1 against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), although it is heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.