Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A50s's overall score of 86.6. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A50s. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy A50s counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite inferior pixels number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, better video frame rate, a larger aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.