Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A51, with an 87.1 score against 85.5. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A51, but it is just a bit thicker and heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A51 has Android 11 version, providing the user a lot of extra features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count in each screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A51 features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a more MP camera in the back, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.