Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with a 90.7 score against 87.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A52 is extremely older than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel quantity in each inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a quite larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and the Galaxy A52 feature extremely similar batteries. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a much less MP resolution back camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and videos and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.