Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it was released many years before. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
Galaxy A52s has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit lower pixel amount in each display inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better memory for applications and games than Galaxy A52s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52s's battery performance is very similar to the battery life in Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.