Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Galaxy A6, having an 87.1 score against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is newer than Galaxy A6's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, a better pixels number per inch of display and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A6 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures, a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.