Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), with a general score of 87.1 against 75.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than the Galaxy A7 (2017), it's just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit better display pixels density, a bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger camera aperture, a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.