Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Galaxy A70, with an 87.1 score against 76.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is extremely newer, but a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A70.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better screen than Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same screen pixels density, a display with the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A70's battery duration is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.