Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with an 87.5 score against 87.1. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 is noticeably older than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's design is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71. They have a screen of the same size, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A71, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A71 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and the Galaxy A71 have incredibly similar batteries performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.