Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is incredibly newer than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s, but it's just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little better pixel count per screen inch and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light situations, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much larger sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 18% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.