Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Galaxy Alpha, getting a global score of 87.1 against 76.3. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is a lot thicker and noticeably heavier than the Galaxy Alpha. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy Alpha has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a sharper display than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a better number of pixels per inch of display, a lot bigger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot better resolution back camera, a way bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.