Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Galaxy C7, with an 87.1 score against 77.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer phone than Galaxy C7, but it is heavier and incredibly thicker.
Galaxy C7 has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a larger screen and a quite greater number of pixels in each display inch.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a camera with a lot better resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.