Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, having a general score of 87.1 against 78.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is newer than the Galaxy C7 Pro's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen, a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels, a larger aperture for better low light images and video and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.