Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's global score of 76.1. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, although it is a little thicker and a bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a larger display and a just a bit higher pixels density.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a bigger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot higher video definition. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with longer battery life than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.