Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-06-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Galaxy J8, with a score of 87.1 against 76.7. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy J8 has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Galaxy J8, but it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker.
Galaxy J8 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has a bit bigger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a greater screen pixel density.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy J8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J8, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.