Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy M20, getting an 87.1 score against 78.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy M20.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M20 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy M20 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video, a lot bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.