Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Galaxy M30, getting an 87.1 score against 82.4. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is newer than Galaxy M30's, but it is heavier and a bit thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy M30 features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M30, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.