Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M40, with an 87.1 score against 85. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy M40's, but it is just a little thicker and heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M40 has Android 10, so it provides some additional features and improved performance.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter screen than Galaxy M40, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rates, a much bigger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.