Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having an 87.7 score against 87.1. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, we must highlight that it is also a noticeably older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little greater pixels count in each inch in the display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M51 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.