Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a score of 90.8 against 87.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, even though it was released 4 years before. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20. Both have a display of the same size, a better amount of pixels per inch of display and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way more mega-pixels back camera, higher video frame rates, a much bigger sensor capturing way higher quality photos and a larger camera aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.