Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's overall score of 87.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is incredibly older and a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's design is still just a little bit thinner.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 12 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, a quite smaller screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery life is very similar to the battery life in Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.