Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is notably newer than Galaxy Note 5's, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, providing the user some nice extra features.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM and 7 less cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with lot more mega-pixels, better video frame rate, a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.